Key Notes
- Cointelegraph categorically denies seeking a buyer and is asking CoinDesk to issue a prominent correction to its report.
- CoinDesk cited an unnamed source and estimated traffic losses of roughly 94%, without disclosing an asking price.
- A limited September search rebound adds context, but does not resolve the disputed sale claim or establish the publisher’s current total audience.
Cointelegraph has denied that it is seeking a buyer, challenging a CoinDesk report that linked a potential sale to a steep decline in the crypto publisher’s website traffic. The company issued its rebuttal on October 8 and called for a prominent correction.
CoinDesk reported that Cointelegraph was looking for a buyer, citing a person familiar with the matter. The report did not disclose an asking price. Cointelegraph’s subsequent denial means the reported sale process remains disputed.
“We are not for sale,” Cointelegraph said in its statement on X, addressed to CoinDesk’s publisher and editorial leadership. It described the report as based on false information and said it contained multiple factual errors.
We are not for sale.
— Cointelegraph (@Cointelegraph) October 8, 2026
Cointelegraph Calls for a Visible Correction
The publisher asked CoinDesk to correct the record, acknowledge the alleged errors and give any correction the same visibility as the original claims. It also objected to the possibility of changes being made without clearly explaining what had been amended.
Its response went beyond the sale allegation to criticize CoinDesk’s editorial approach. Those criticisms represent Cointelegraph’s position in a dispute between two competing news organizations; they do not independently establish why the original report was published.
The statement’s central factual claim is categorical: Cointelegraph says it is not for sale. However, it does not provide an itemized response to the audience figures cited in the report, publish alternative traffic statistics or disclose financial results.
Those are separate questions. A publisher can reject a report about its ownership plans without resolving a debate over its website audience. Likewise, a fall in estimated traffic cannot, on its own, establish that a business is seeking a buyer.
The Reported 94% Traffic Decline
CoinDesk’s report cited Similarweb figures showing more than 12 million monthly visits in December 2024 and just over 700,000 by early September 2026. That comparison represents a decline of roughly 94%, although the underlying figures are rounded.
The early-September reading is historical. It should not be presented as a verified measure of Cointelegraph’s current October audience. The figures cited by CoinDesk are also third-party estimates, rather than an independently audited account of the publisher’s internal analytics.
The report separately described an approximately 80% decline in organic search traffic following a Google manual action in October 2025. Organic search traffic and total website visits measure different things, so the two percentages are not interchangeable.
Total visits can include people arriving directly, through social media, referrals and other channels. A change in Google visibility concerns one route to the site and does not automatically describe every part of the publication’s readership.
A September Search Rebound Adds Context
There were already signs of a limited improvement before the sale report. CoinScreamer’s September coverage details an analysis by TheHolyCoins showing an increase in Cointelegraph’s estimated organic search traffic around August 30.
By September 7, Ahrefs and Semrush showed estimated monthly organic traffic of approximately 4,433 and 5,387, respectively. Those readings came from search-ranking models and cannot be compared directly with Similarweb’s estimate of total website visits.
The timing coincided with Google changing its site reputation policy enforcement for users in the European Economic Area. That regional adjustment was not an announcement that Cointelegraph’s individual case had been resolved worldwide.
A partial search recovery from a depressed starting point can coexist with a much larger decline measured against December 2024. The September rebound therefore adds context to the traffic story, but does not prove or disprove the separate allegation that the company was seeking a buyer.
Ownership Claims Remain Contested
Founded in 2013, Cointelegraph is one of the longest-running publications focused on digital assets. Its company profile describes a distributed team working across more than 50 countries and covering blockchain, finance and emerging technology.
The dispute puts the publisher’s business plans and the reliability of external audience measurements under scrutiny. Neither a headline traffic percentage nor an early search rebound provides enough information to determine its revenue, profitability or valuation.
The public record currently contains two conflicting accounts: CoinDesk’s anonymously sourced report of a buyer search and Cointelegraph’s explicit denial. No asking price, named prospective buyer or transaction terms have been publicly established in the material supporting those accounts.
Disclaimer: CoinScreamer is an independent media brand owned and operated by NuvexMedia LLC, publishing news, research, and market insights on digital assets and related technologies. NuvexMedia LLC invests in and collaborates with companies across the digital asset, blockchain, and technology sectors. These relationships do not influence CoinScreamer’s editorial coverage, and the publication maintains full editorial independence to provide accurate, timely, and objective information. © 2025 NuvexMedia LLC. All rights reserved. This content is for informational purposes only and should not be considered legal, tax, investment, financial, or other professional advice.
