Key Notes
- Standard Chartered’s Geoffrey Kendrick expects further crypto weakness before the market establishes a base.
- Kendrick retains a $100 UNI forecast for 2030, a long-term analyst target rather than a guaranteed outcome.
- Binance pledges full loss coverage while deposits operate normally and withdrawals remain paused.
Standard Chartered expects further weakness in crypto markets after the Binance hack, with Geoffrey Kendrick arguing that investors need more clarity on the incident before prices establish a base. The bank’s global head of digital assets research made the assessment in an email cited by CoinDesk. He linked a new base to assets being unfrozen and more details emerging about the hack.
Kendrick’s near-term caution comes alongside a longer-term preference for decentralized trading. He argues that problems at a major centralized exchange could encourage a shift toward DEXs and retained his $100 forecast for Uniswap’s UNI token in 2030. That is an analyst’s price target, not a promised return or a near-term BTC forecast.
Bitcoin Trades Above Its Overnight Low
Price update at 08:06 UTC on October 30: Coinbase spot quotes placed Bitcoin at approximately $77,941.87 and ether at approximately $2,227.03. These are timestamped observations, rather than live prices or quotes from the earlier bank commentary.
Coinbase’s saved hourly data show Bitcoin reached $76,301.02 in the candle beginning at 02:00 UTC. The subsequent quote was above that overnight low, while still below $80,000. A rebound from a low does not, by itself, establish the durable base Kendrick is discussing.
CoinDesk’s early-Friday market snapshot put total liquidations at about $1.5 billion, including $468 million linked to Bitcoin and $358 million to ether, with long positions bearing most of the damage. Those are the publication’s reported figures, rather than a newly verified running total.
Kendrick Sees a Longer-Term Opening for Uniswap
The bank’s view separates an immediate confidence shock from a possible longer-term shift in trading venues. CoinDesk reported that UNI was also falling in its market snapshot, underscoring that a proposed benefit for decentralized exchanges had not insulated their tokens from the selloff.
There is a distinction between adoption of a trading protocol and the price of its token. Uniswap Labs’ October 22 announcement says Aggregator Hooks connect seven external liquidity sources through Uniswap v4 on Ethereum, Base and Robinhood Chain. Routes can combine those sources in one transaction, and associated protocol fees contribute to UNI burns.
Our Aggregator Hooks coverage explains the rollout and its limits. The launch gives context for Uniswap’s expansion, but it supplies neither a guaranteed burn amount nor evidence that UNI will reach Kendrick’s 2030 target.
Binance’s Coverage Pledge and Recovery Remain Separate
Binance’s own statement estimates the hack’s impact at around $6.3 billion and says roughly $3 billion in affected assets has been frozen. It pledges to cover all losses using SAFU and company funds and says user funds are safe. The pledge does not mean all stolen assets have been recovered or all restricted transfers have been restored.
Its preliminary explanation points to a possible compromise of a DevOps engineer’s laptop, access to a service container and unauthorized withdrawals. Binance says it has found no evidence of wallet private-key leakage and will publish a technical post-mortem after the facts are verified. Our main incident report follows those company statements and the researchers’ findings.
The later service update at 04:36 UTC says deposits are operating normally, while withdrawals remain paused with a target of resuming within 48 hours. That supersedes the earlier description of a suspension covering both services; the withdrawal target is not confirmation of reopening.
The recovery challenge also differs by asset. Issuers can freeze supported stablecoins through token controls, while Bitcoin has no issuer-operated blacklist. Our follow-up on 18,270 BTC split across 19 addresses explains why tracing stolen coins, restricting them at a custodian and recovering them are distinct steps. Those operational developments will matter alongside prices as the market assesses the incident.
Disclaimer: CoinScreamer is an independent media brand owned and operated by NuvexMedia LLC, publishing news, research, and market insights on digital assets and related technologies. NuvexMedia LLC invests in and collaborates with companies across the digital asset, blockchain, and technology sectors. These relationships do not influence CoinScreamer’s editorial coverage, and the publication maintains full editorial independence to provide accurate, timely, and objective information. © 2025 NuvexMedia LLC. All rights reserved. This content is for informational purposes only and should not be considered legal, tax, investment, financial, or other professional advice.
