Arthur Hayes has argued that a pullback in US artificial intelligence spending could eventually trigger government support for AI infrastructure or stressed insurers, creating dollar liquidity that he expects would favor Bitcoin.
Hayes wrote in his September 22 essay, Safety First, that recent calls by major US AI companies to slow frontier model development may have an economic explanation alongside safety concerns. He suggested demand for expensive AI services could prove weaker than the spending assumptions supporting data centers, chips, and related debt.
OpenAI and Anthropic have publicly attributed development pacing to cybersecurity and safety safeguards rather than falling demand. However, Hayes contends that lower demand for training and inference could weaken cash-flow assumptions behind semiconductor purchases and private credit tied to the sector, writing that “Safety First is by definition compute demand destruction”.
Arthur Hayes Sees AI Debt as the Pressure Point
Apollo research indicates that AI-related issuance accounted for nearly 40% of longer-duration investment-grade corporate bond supply in August, with estimates that the ecosystem could support over $2 trillion in additional investment-grade debt through 2030. Consensual projections assume operating cash flows at five major hyperscalers, Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, Microsoft, and Oracle, will grow from $600 billion to $2 trillion by 2030, leaving the sector vulnerable to credit spread widening if cash flows lag.
Insurance Exposure Remains Disputed in Hayes’s Thesis
The second pillar of Hayes’s argument concerns insurers and private credit. Citing research by Nick Nemeth, Hayes suggests affiliated reinsurance structures totaling $1.54 trillion across the US life and annuity industry could leave some insurers exposed if AI-related debt is marked lower.
While the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) actively monitors private credit for liquidity and valuation risks, current industry data does not show insolvency across the sector. A Moody’s survey estimated direct US insurer exposure to data centers at up to $20 billion, though Hayes’s systemic thesis relies on broader indirect exposures.
Bitcoin Thesis Depends on a Future Liquidity Response
Hayes outlines two potential government responses if AI infrastructure economics deteriorate: Washington acting as a “compute buyer of last resort” or offering financial backstops to insurers. Both scenarios would require increased government borrowing or direct monetary support, boosting demand for scarce financial assets like Bitcoin.
Current Federal Reserve policy moves in the opposite direction from immediate easing, having raised the target rate by 25 basis points to 3.75%–4.00% on Sept. 16. Additionally, reserve-management purchases remain paused.
AI Companies Are Still Spending Despite Safety Calls
Immediate collapse in AI infrastructure spending remains unverified. Nvidia announced platform partnerships with Apollo, BlackRock, and Blackstone intended to mobilize $500 billion in private compute financing, while SoftBank began marketing over $11 billion in high-yield bonds to finance its OpenAI commitments.
Meanwhile, Bitcoin traded near $85,700 early Sept. 22 after gaining over 6% in the previous session.
Disclaimer: CoinScreamer is an independent media brand owned and operated by NuvexMedia LLC, publishing news, research, and market insights on digital assets and related technologies. NuvexMedia LLC invests in and collaborates with companies across the digital asset, blockchain, and technology sectors. These relationships do not influence CoinScreamer’s editorial coverage, and the publication maintains full editorial independence to provide accurate, timely, and objective information. © 2025 NuvexMedia LLC. All rights reserved. This content is for informational purposes only and should not be considered legal, tax, investment, financial, or other professional advice.
