Key Notes
- DOJ officials are reviewing Binance’s compliance with its $4.3 billion 2023 settlement, Bloomberg reported.
- A separate civil forfeiture case seeks approximately $61 million in USDT allegedly tied to Iranian oil sales.
- The plea agreement permits further prosecution after a breach, but no breach determination or new penalty has been announced.
The U.S. Justice Department is reviewing Binance’s compliance with its $4.3 billion settlement as prosecutors investigate potential violations of sanctions on Iran, Bloomberg reported on October 9. The scrutiny puts the exchange’s obligations under its 2023 guilty plea back in focus.
Tysen Duva, who leads the DOJ’s Criminal Division, confirmed the compliance review in an interview with Bloomberg. He declined to provide details and did not say Binance had violated the agreement. A review is therefore under way, but a breach determination has not been announced.
The distinction matters because the settlement carries consequences beyond its original financial penalty. Its terms allow further prosecution if Binance breaches its commitments, while a separate forfeiture case seeks approximately $61 million allegedly connected to Iranian oil sales.
What Binance Agreed to in 2023
Binance pleaded guilty on November 21, 2023, to offenses involving the Bank Secrecy Act, operating an unlicensed money-transmitting business and the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. The DOJ’s resolution set a total financial penalty of approximately $4.316 billion, comprising about $2.511 billion in forfeiture and a $1.805 billion criminal fine.
The agreement also required improvements to anti-money-laundering and sanctions controls and initially provided for a three-year independent compliance monitor. Separate coordinated resolutions involved the Treasury Department’s FinCEN and OFAC, as well as the Commodity Futures Trading Commission.
Those obligations extended beyond paying the penalty. Under the plea agreement, Binance must promptly report evidence or allegations of specified misconduct it learns about during the agreement’s term, including potential money-laundering and sanctions violations. It must also cooperate with prosecutors and provide complete and truthful information.
The original case concerned historical failures to screen customers, monitor transactions and prevent prohibited dealings involving U.S. users. The current review concerns whether the company has fulfilled the commitments it accepted to resolve that case.
A $61 Million Forfeiture Case Targets Alleged Oil Proceeds
On September 14, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York announced a civil forfeiture complaint seeking cryptocurrency allegedly derived from black-market Iranian crude oil and petroleum sales. Prosecutors said the proceeds were intended to support Iranian government and military entities, including the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps.
The complaint alleges that two Chinese companies, Blessed Trust and Hexa Whale, used Binance trading accounts to process and launder oil-sale proceeds. Prosecutors described a broader network of related addresses that received and distributed more than $1.5 billion. That figure refers to the alleged network’s activity, rather than the amount sought in the forfeiture action.
The court filing identifies approximately 61.19 million USDT across 10 addresses on TRON. It says Tether had frozen the targeted tokens in June and July 2025 and describes arrangements for transferring their value into U.S. government custody.
The action targets allegedly illicit assets. It does not itself establish that Binance committed a new criminal offense or breached its settlement. The Justice Department expressly identifies the complaint’s factual claims as allegations.
Binance Says It Investigated and Removed the Accounts
Binance has previously disputed reporting about its handling of Iran-linked transactions. In a March 10 response, it said investigators identified the Blessed Trust and Hexa Whale accounts after law-enforcement requests, examined the activity and removed the relevant accounts from the platform.
The exchange said the funds passed through multiple intermediaries and that problematic connections became apparent through investigation. It also denied firing employees for raising compliance concerns or suppressing the investigations. Those statements describe Binance’s position on the earlier allegations; they are not a DOJ finding that its settlement obligations were satisfied.
CoinScreamer covered the company’s earlier denial and its published compliance figures. The latest report adds confirmation from a senior DOJ official that the department is examining compliance with the agreement.
How a Settlement Breach Could Lead to Further Prosecution
The plea agreement’s breach provisions cover failures to cooperate, implement required controls or fulfill other obligations, alongside specified unlawful conduct. They allow prosecutors to pursue federal criminal violations known to them, including charges described in the original case.
The agreement also sets out a procedure: prosecutors must provide written notice before bringing a prosecution resulting from a breach. Binance then has 30 days to respond in writing, explain the circumstances and describe remediation. Prosecutors must consider that response when deciding whether to proceed.
That leaves an important unresolved step between the reported review and prosecution under the breach provisions. Bloomberg’s report does not establish that the DOJ has invoked those provisions, and no new penalty amount has been announced. Any additional prosecution or financial sanction remains contingent on further decisions and the applicable legal process.
Disclaimer: CoinScreamer is an independent media brand owned and operated by NuvexMedia LLC, publishing news, research, and market insights on digital assets and related technologies. NuvexMedia LLC invests in and collaborates with companies across the digital asset, blockchain, and technology sectors. These relationships do not influence CoinScreamer’s editorial coverage, and the publication maintains full editorial independence to provide accurate, timely, and objective information. © 2025 NuvexMedia LLC. All rights reserved. This content is for informational purposes only and should not be considered legal, tax, investment, financial, or other professional advice.
